Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than Moto Z Force, with an 85.6 score against 75.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a extremely newer and just a bit thinner device than the Moto Z Force, although it's also heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Moto Z Force captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Moto Z Force also has a camera with a way better resolution. Moto Z Force has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.