Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a overall score of 85.6 against 76.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it is heavier. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little better processing power than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a much more megapixels back facing camera. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.