Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has greater battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited situations, they both have a back camera with a 12 MP resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.