Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is way newer than Moto Z2 Play, it's thicker and much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a just a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The Moto Z2 Play features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.