Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction has the same thickness than Motorola Moto Z3, but it is somewhat heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a little larger display.
Moto Z3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, they both have a same resolution camera in the back. The Moto Z3 features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.