Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than Motorola One 5G, with an 85.6 score against 84.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer, thinner and lighter than the Motorola One 5G. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola One 5G has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a camera with lot more MP.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One 5G, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.