Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Motorola One Action, getting a score of 85.6 against 78.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer and noticeably thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Action. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a quite bigger screen. Motorola One Action has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Action features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 6% larger battery size. The Motorola One Action features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have the same aperture and a same resolution back facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.