Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a little heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's a lot thinner and extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision features a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.