Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is slightly better than Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer, just a little lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola One Zoom. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a bit higher pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
Motorola One Zoom counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Motorola One Zoom takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Zoom. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Zoom, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.