Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Motorola razr (2020) is an older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier device than Galaxy Z Flip 3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020). Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit larger screen, a little more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Motorola razr (2020) features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs more than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Z Flip 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.