Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's general score of 80.3. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer, way thinner and somewhat lighter than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better processing power than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a camera in the back with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.