Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | OnePlus |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-12-06 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Papaya orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren's general score of 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is newer, notably thinner and somewhat lighter than the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version and OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bit better pixels number per display inch. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has more RAM.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light environments. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.