Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2017). The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a bigger screen and a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A5 (2017) captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.