Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's global score of 85.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is an older and just a little thicker phone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but Samsung managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bit higher display density. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50s shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.