Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a 90.8 score against 85.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an older, just a bit heavier and extremely thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. These phones use the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a bit higher screen density, a little larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Galaxy A51 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.