Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, with a 90.7 score against 85.6. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is thicker and just a bit heavier than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a little more pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy A52 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. The Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.