Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design has the same weight than Galaxy A70, but it is thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A70 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A70. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A70, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.