Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, having an 87.5 score against 85.6. Samsung Galaxy A71 is an older and a bit thicker phone than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but Samsung made it just a little bit lighter anyway. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give you identical operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.