Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. Even being the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit more pixels per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.