Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, with a global score of 88.1 against 85.6. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. The Galaxy F62 is an a lot thicker and heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit lower pixels density, they both have a display of the same size.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.