Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's overall score of 85.6. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, it must be noted that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a little better pixels count in each inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.