Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a general score of 85.6 against 79.3. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is notably newer and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it's also just a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more powerful processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 5 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy Note 5. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.