Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a notably older and thicker cellphone than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. Galaxy S10e counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although the Galaxy S10e has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a CPU that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S10e has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10e also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Galaxy S10e not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.