Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a global score of 94.8 against 85.6. Although Galaxy S20 is older and thicker than Galaxy Z Flip 3, it's body is still lighter. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a 12 MP back facing camera and a same size diafragm aperture. The Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S20 costs exactly the same than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.