Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 global score. The Galaxy S20 FE design is older, thicker and just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a little bit bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite greater pixels density. The Galaxy S20 FE's processing unit is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip 3's processing unit, and although the Galaxy S20 FE has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same aperture. The Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36% more battery size.
The Galaxy S20 FE not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.