Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 general score. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a bit better display pixels density and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.