Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a 95.4 score against 85.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, it must be noted that it is also noticeably thicker and notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a just a little higher screen pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Galaxy Z Flip 3 one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs more than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.