Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is way newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it is somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity in each screen inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.