Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is much newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it is also heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy S7 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Galaxy S7 also has a larger aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy S7, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.