Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a noticeably newer device, and it is also notably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixels number in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S7 Active shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Galaxy S7 Active also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.