Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge, getting a overall score of 85.6 against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 edge. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has older 11 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S7 edge takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy S7 edge features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.