Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 85.6 score against 80.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer, incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a 12 megapixels camera, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.