Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer, notably thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit better number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a lot better 25 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy XCover Pro has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy XCover Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.