Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a 94.6 score against 85.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body has the same thickness than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it is notably heavier. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2636 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same resolution camera in the back.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.