Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, with a global score of 85.6 against 79.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is much newer, thinner and just a little lighter than Sony Xperia XZ Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2160 x 3840px resolution and a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium features a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in low light situations, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better battery duration than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.