Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a general score of 85.6 against 79. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is much newer and incredibly thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it is just a little heavier.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot higher 19 megapixels resolution back facing camera. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.