Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, having an 85.6 score against 82.2. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a much newer cellphone, and it's also incredibly thinner and lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a much better pixels amount per display inch.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium and Galaxy Z Flip 3 feature quite similar processing units, and although the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 400 GB. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has just a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3540mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs exactly the same than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.