Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Xperia Z4v, having a global score of 85.6 against 78.8. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, giving you a couple additional features. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Xperia Z4v, although it's heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xperia Z4v features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xperia Z4v. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xperia Z4v, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.