Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, with an 85.6 score against 81.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's, but it is heavier. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a camera with a much better resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's one, both have the same internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.