Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, getting an 85.6 score against 82.2. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is much newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a just a little worse screen density, a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 one, both have the same internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.