Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's score of 82.7. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer, just a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a little smaller display. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 and the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro both feature similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.