Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an older, heavier and incredibly thicker phone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little worse display pixel density, they both have a screen with the same size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip 3's one, both have equal internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 42% larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.