Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2, getting an 85.6 score against 79.3. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide very similar OS features. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and noticeably thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X2.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a quite higher pixel number in each inch of screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X2 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.