Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a score of 85.6 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit less pixels per display inch, they both have a screen of the same size.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.