Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a score of 85.6 against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is a little bit lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even when both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a little bit higher pixels count per inch of display, a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.