Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having a global score of 85.6 against 82.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a thinner and just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, although both were released only 5 months apart. Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little lower count of pixels per inch of display, they both have a same size screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a greater storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.