Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a score of 85.6 against 81.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer, noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit greater pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.