Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's global score of 83. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a just a little lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a bit bigger display, a bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.