Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's 92.3 score. Even though Apple iPhone 13 Pro is newer than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G comes with Android 11 OS.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density and a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a 12 mega-pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.