Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, getting a 93.2 score against 92.3. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy Z Flip 5G comes with Android 11 OS. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is newer than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, it is notably heavier and just a little thicker.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a bit higher 1284 x 2778 resolution and a little greater screen density. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same video quality, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and a 12 MP resolution back facing camera.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy Z Flip 5G. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.